My Photo

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

« December 2007 | Main | February 2008 »

Posts from January 2008

January 29, 2008

Google Getting Serious About Different Ways To View Search Results

Google Getting Serious About Different Ways To View Search Results

Posted: 28 Jan 2008 02:17 PM CST

Google took the time today to write a rather lengthy post on the main Official Google Blog all about the new search result views they are working on. I've tried out a few of these experimental search result layouts in the past, but something is different now, they actually appear to be useful.

The new layouts are 'Info view', 'Timeline view', 'Map view', and then there is the traditional 'List view'. 'Info view' looks like the traditional list view except that you now have options on the right-hand side to further refine your search. Clicking on an option such as 'Dates' allows you to put in a date range filter. There are also options for 'Measurements', 'Locations', and 'Images'.

'Timeline view' is a bit like using the date filter in 'info view' except that results are laid out in a much different way. Obviously the key to this view is the timeline itself which is on hover shows you where you can click and upon click can potentially drill down to a narrower timeline to further refine results.

Finally 'map view' shows you any places mentioned in the search results on a map. This can be very handy for doing something like historical searches. It very much reminds me of the Google Book Search data being integrated with Maps.

The experimental search page gives you a few options with which you can test out these new layouts. This is where you will also go if you want to opt-in to test out these new layouts on all your searches going forward.

It certainly seems like Google is starting to get serious about moving beyond the traditional 10 item search result pages that we all have come to know. No doubt that will always be an option, but it's nice to see new ways of manipulating results to find just what you are looking for in more intuitive ways.

January 27, 2008

The Age of Ambition

from NYTimes.com

January 27, 2008
  

DAVOS, Switzerland

With the American presidential campaign in full swing, the obvious way to change the world might seem to be through politics.

But growing numbers of young people are leaping into the fray and doing the job themselves. These are the social entrepreneurs, the 21st-century answer to the student protesters of the 1960s, and they are some of the most interesting people here at the World Economic Forum (not only because they’re half the age of everyone else).

Andrew Klaber, a 26-year-old playing hooky from Harvard Business School to come here (don’t tell his professors!), is an example of the social entrepreneur. He spent the summer after his sophomore year in college in Thailand and was aghast to see teenage girls being forced into prostitution after their parents had died of AIDS.

So he started Orphans Against AIDS (www.orphansagainstaids.org), which pays school-related expenses for hundreds of children who have been orphaned or otherwise affected by AIDS in poor countries. He and his friends volunteer their time and pay administrative costs out of their own pockets so that every penny goes to the children.

Mr. Klaber was able to expand the nonprofit organization in Africa through introductions made by Jennifer Staple, who was a year ahead of him when they were in college. When she was a sophomore, Ms. Staple founded an organization in her dorm room to collect old reading glasses in the United States and ship them to poor countries. That group, Unite for Sight, has ballooned, and last year it provided eye care to 200,000 people (www.uniteforsight.org).

In the ’60s, perhaps the most remarkable Americans were the civil rights workers and antiwar protesters who started movements that transformed the country. In the 1980s, the most fascinating people were entrepreneurs like Steve Jobs and Bill Gates, who started companies and ended up revolutionizing the way we use technology.

Today the most remarkable young people are the social entrepreneurs, those who see a problem in society and roll up their sleeves to address it in new ways. Bill Drayton, the chief executive of an organization called Ashoka that supports social entrepreneurs, likes to say that such people neither hand out fish nor teach people to fish; their aim is to revolutionize the fishing industry. If that sounds insanely ambitious, it is. John Elkington and Pamela Hartigan title their new book on social entrepreneurs “The Power of Unreasonable People.”

Universities are now offering classes in social entrepreneurship, and there are a growing number of role models. Wendy Kopp turned her thesis at Princeton into Teach for America and has had far more impact on schools than the average secretary of education.

One of the social entrepreneurs here is Soraya Salti, a 37-year-old Jordanian woman who is trying to transform the Arab world by teaching entrepreneurship in schools. Her organization, Injaz, is now training 100,000 Arab students each year to find a market niche, construct a business plan and then launch and nurture a business.

The program (www.injaz.org.jo) has spread to 12 Arab countries and is aiming to teach one million students a year. Ms. Salti argues that entrepreneurs can stimulate the economy, give young people a purpose and revitalize the Arab world. Girls in particular have flourished in the program, which has had excellent reviews and is getting support from the U.S. Agency for International Development. My hunch is that Ms. Salti will contribute more to stability and peace in the Middle East than any number of tanks in Iraq, U.N. resolutions or summit meetings.

“If you can capture the youth and change the way they think, then you can change the future,” she said.

Another young person on a mission is Ariel Zylbersztejn, a 27-year-old Mexican who founded and runs a company called Cinepop, which projects movies onto inflatable screens and shows them free in public parks. Mr. Zylbersztejn realized that 90 percent of Mexicans can’t afford to go to movies, so he started his own business model: He sells sponsorships to companies to advertise to the thousands of viewers who come to watch the free entertainment.

Mr. Zylbersztejn works with microcredit agencies and social welfare groups to engage the families that come to his movies and help them start businesses or try other strategies to overcome poverty. Cinepop is only three years old, but already 250,000 people a year watch movies on his screens — and his goal is to take the model to Brazil, India, China and other countries.

So as we follow the presidential campaign, let’s not forget that the winner isn’t the only one who will shape the world. Only one person can become president of the United States, but there’s no limit to the number of social entrepreneurs who can make this planet a better place.

 

You are invited to comment on this column at Mr. Kristof’s blog, www.nytimes.com/ontheground.

January 26, 2008

Are Facebook Applications A Privacy Disaster In The Making?


I've become steadily less enthralled with Facebook applications as I've become more familiar with them. In theory, a platform strategy is a great idea -- indeed, few tech companies have been really successful without building platforms that other companies can leverage to dramatically increase the value of the whole ecosystem. But not every platform strategy will necessarily be a success. And often, the crucial thing that separates a successful platform strategy from an unsuccessful one is the ability to design a good interface between the core technology and the add-on functionality. If the interface is too limited, other companies won't be able to do anything with the platform. Conversely, if the interface is too expansive, it can allow the entire platform to descend into a chaotic mess, as shoddy add-on products can undermine the reputation of the entire ecosystem. It appears that Facebook's application platform is in danger of falling into the latter trap.

Chris Soghoian has a great post arguing that Facebook's permissive policies regarding application access to user data poses a serious threat to user privacy that could seriously damage Facebook's reputation. Soghoian says that applications are given access not just to all of a given user's information (much of which is unnecessary for the application to perform its functions) but also to a lot of information about a user's friends, many of whom will not have consented to have their information shared with random third-party applications. There's is a page buried deep in the Facebook preferences that allows users to disable your friends' applications from accessing this information about you, but the information is shared by default, and the page isn't going to win any awards for clarity. The situation poses a serious problem for Facebook. On the one hand, it has an obligation to preserve their users' privacy. On the other hand, it desperately wants to enhance the functionality of the Facebook platform and prove that it's more than a toy for college kids. An overly-restrictive privacy policy could make it impossible for anyone to develop the killer app Facebook craves. I'm not sure exactly where to draw the line, but I think Soghoian is right that the current system has too few safeguards against the misues of private information by third-party applications.

From Waste to Water, Drink It Up!

www.parislemon.com

Of all the problems facing California (earthquakes, wildfires, electricity shortages, etc...), the biggest issue may be a water supply that teeters on the brink of crisis. But today Wired is reporting some excellent news in the field of renewable water - Orange County has put in place a $480 million dollar microfiltration system that turns waste water into drinking water.

As disgusting as that may sound, the Groundwater Replenishment System began purifying water a little over 2 weeks ago and can now supposedly provide clean, fresh drinking water to over 100,000 homes - for the same price or possibly even cheaper than buying it wholesale.

While Green Tech was first all the rage, then got some backlash as little more than a buzzword, and now will undoubtedly be slaughtered as every Presidential candidate "goes green" - things like this are exactly what we need for the 21st century. Other cities in California as well as Texas and Florida are already looking into creating their own microfiltration plants.

Editor's Pick: Getting Creepy With Your Data
Customers' privacy and their data are two immutable and opposing forces
that a company must always try to balance, usually unsuccessfully. Few
for-profit firms have proven themselves able to resist the lure of
monetizing their customers' and users' data. Some consumer advocates
have put up a good fight in keeping such privacy intrusions to a
minimum.
http://www.ecommercetimes.com/story/61312.html

January 25, 2008

Google Introduces Demographic Bidding to AdWords


Do means justify ends?

Google has given AdWords advertisers the ability to target ad buys by demographic, according to the official AdWords blog.

The demographic bidding feature was introduced in limited beta. Advertisers must run contextual- or placement-targeted ads to participate, or to bid on demo-delivered ads at all.

Demographic bidding is best used to target ads for social networking or other sites that collect large amounts of user data. The data is made anonymous to protect user privacy and reported to Google, which uses it to target ads.

Bidding can be adjusted via existing demographic conversion data, available in AdWords' reporting tools. The data enables advertisers to assess which demographic groups perform well.

Two months ago, AllFacebook revealed that Google accessed private user data on Facebook to augment AdWords, which violates Facebook's terms of service.

Google blamed the occurrence on a "data glitch" and had allegedly "fixed" the issue.

Super Panel At Davos: The Future Of Mobile Technology

techcrunch.com

Fortune Senior Editor David Kirkpatrick led a power-packed session at Davos this afternoon called The Future of Mobile Technology. Panelists included Google CEO Eric Schmidt, FCC Chairman Kevin Martin, Sony CEO Sir Howard Stringer, NBC Universal CEO Jeff Zucker, SK Telecom CEO Kim Shin-Bae and China Mobile CEO Wang Jianzhou.

Kirkpatrick attempted to steer the conversation towards asian growth in mobile (China Mobile dominates the Chinese market and is adding 6 million new mobile subscribers per month, SK Telecom dominates Korea with more than 50% market share) and the bleak prospects for mobile advertising revenue. He quoted Forrester as saying that the U.S. mobile advertising market is projected to be under $1 billion even as far ahead as 2012. Today, he said, only 3% of Internet advertisers are putting display ads on mobile devices.

Google Android And The Mobile Tipping Point

Schmidt played down the revenue estimate, saying the tipping point in mobile had not been reached. When it does in the next year or so, he said, those revenue projections will be very low. He said his goal with Google’s new Android platform is to help the market reach that tipping point, and make money from mobile advertising along the way.

Schmidt also argued that mobile devices are potentially more interesting than PCs, since they have or will have GPS and other features that will allow for new kinds of applications, as well as location-based advertising. The key, he said, is that new services will be on an open platform with open standards (Android, of course), and that the new 7700MHz spectrum rules permit it (they do, mostly). That sets the stage, he said, for a “huge revolution” in mobile. Without it, we have closed network “islands.”

Asian Growth: Mobile Devices Becoming Extension of Humanness

China Mobile CEO Wang Jianzhou noted that they have 317 million mobile customers in China today, and the total market is half a billion users. He said that people are using mobile devices as extensions of themselves to reach out to others via voice and SMS, and that if someone doesn’t have a mobile phone they will lack basic functions of what it is to be human.

His company is adding 6 million new subscribers per month. When asked if he is considering expansion outside of China, he replied that they have so much growth potential there that they are completely focused on that market.

NBC See Dollar Signs In Mobile, Sony Not So Much

Both Stringer (Sony) and Zucker (NBC) want to sell content to mobile users, but they have very different opinions on how effective they’ll be.

Zucker lamented the currently fragmented U.S. market, but seems optimistic that they’ll be able to move their merchandise effectively in the future (particularly short form video). He also said revenue splits need to change dramatically - today content creators are offered only 10% of revenue from sales, with the vast majority going to the carrier. Competition and openness will change this, he said.

Stringer was less optimistic, noting, for example, that Chinese customers don’t buy content, just blank CDs. “It won’t be easy to hang onto the price of content” he said, adding a quip: “When you defend the status quo when the quo has lost its status, you’re in trouble.” Stringer is highly charismatic and entertaining, but his distress came through clearly. At one point when someone asked him when new Sony OLED screen technology would come to mobile devices at a reasonable price point, he noted the high cost of production and joked “making a profit on consumer electronic devices is one of our goals.”

FCC Defends Its Compromise

FCC Chairman Kevin Martin defended their recent decision to partly open up the mobile market, but reject many of the key rules requested by Google.

For example, requiring network operators to sell access to others at wholesale rates would reduce their incentive to “upkeep the pipes.” Investment in infrastructure is key, he said, and forcing open networks could hurt the industry.

I asked Martin whether Google’s open letter put pressure on him and his commissioners to open up the spectrum rules. He said it didn’t, citing far more private pressure to keep things static from the existing carriers. It did give him a tool to help convince his commissioners to open up at least partially, he said.

Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.

January 24, 2008

Adults Encroach Upon Youth Turf Online

techdirt.com

Culture)

As technology starts to develop at a quicker and quicker pace, a generational digital divide has started to form between the children, who are growing up amidst all of this new technology, and their parents, who are left to play catch up. So, though most adults are now familiar with technologies like email (which has been around for decades now), more are starting to use instant messaging and social networking sites like MySpace or Facebook. We're not referring to the so-called "online predators" that have been the subject of numerous tv specials. As mom and dad embrace these technologies, today's youths complain that grown-ups are encroaching upon their "turf" and would prefer that they stay on their side of the generational digital divide. Online youths have been quick to embrace the sites like Facebook as somewhat of a social theater where they where they publicly canoodle with crushes, post pictures of the previous night's escapades, and comment openly on each others' profiles. Now, as adults get hip to the internet, these once private worlds are now at risk of being invaded. Back when these adults were kids, there was never really a fear of their parents invading their parties, or crashing their proms, so now some youths feel it necessary to keep a "grown-up friendly" online presence, thereby ruining the appeal of such sites. It might behoove Facebook to introduce more selective sharing levels, lest their most avid users start to lose interest in actually using the site. That said, this problem of over-sharing is not unique to youths -- for quite some time now, adults have been getting into trouble over their online profi les as well.

Google and Publicis Make Nice

from businessweek.com

Undercutting rumors of bad blood, the search giant and the Paris-based agency disclose a secret deal to craft millions of targeted, online ads

On his way to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Google (GOOG) Chief Executive Eric Schmidt stopped by the Paris headquarters of the world's fourth-largest advertising agency, Publicis Groupe (PUBP.PA), on Jan. 22 to exchange honeyed words with its chief executive, Maurice Lévy.

The two disclosed a confidential partnership already

Google Health Nearing Launch?

parislemon.com

Google Health Nearing Launch?

Posted: 23 Jan 2008 07:52 PM CST

It appears Google may have inadvertently put up the login page for its upcoming Google Health project a bit early. Google Blogoscoped stumbled upon the following link:

https://www.google.com/accounts/ServiceLogin?service=health

Which takes you to the Google Health Beta login page that describes the service a bit:

With Google Health, you can:

  • Build online health profiles that belong to you
  • Download medical records from doctors and pharmacies
  • Get personalized health guidance and relevant news
  • Find qualified doctors and connect to time-saving services
  • Share selected information with family or caregivers
It looks like this service is going to have some very interesting and very powerful features with a goal of making the managing of your medical information easier. Privacy and security advocates are no doubt going to be up in arms about some of these things.

Neither the 'Take a quick tour' link or the logging-in functionality currently work, but it would seem Google is getting rather close to kicking this thing off.

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~a/parislemon?a=oz6YmX

http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/parislemon?a=IWRFaed http://feeds.feedburner.com/~f/parislemon?a=NBaPZyd