Wednesday, August 26, 2009 by Dave Winer.
http://www.scripting.com/stories/2009/08/26/rssIsHowTheNewsFlows.html
To Sam Diaz who says RSS was "a good idea at the time but there are better ways now," I have many things to say. ![]()
1. People confuse RSS with Google Reader. Let's be
clear that there's a difference. Google Reader is an application that
reads RSS-formatted data. There are many other applications that read
and write RSS. ![]()
2. I think Google Reader was, on the whole, a good
thing. It's probably the best reader of its variety. You have to go
find the new stuff in Google Reader. I prefer a reader that finds the
new stuff for me, and presents it in reverse chronologic order. This is
known as a river of news reader. ![]()
3. Diaz more or less says that's his preference too. Interesting. ![]()
4. My newspaper doesn't tell me how many articles I
haven't read going back to the date of my birth. I bet it would be in
the millions. Why should I care. This was the worst idea ever in news
readers. ![]()
5.
The core problem -- so many programmers who write RSS software are not
themselves news junkies. If they were they'd know when they got it
wrong. News is about what's new! Show me the newest stuff first. Sorry
to all the articles I didn't read, maybe in the next lifetime. ![]()
6. He may not use a RSS reader, but the news is still getting to him through RSS. ![]()
7. If all the RSS on the planet were all of a
sudden to stop updating (key point) the news would stop flowing. Any
news guy or gal who thinks they could get by without RSS -- think this
through a bit more. We all love the Internet, but don't shut off your
gas and electric because your computer and router wouldn't work without
electricity. Same with RSS and news. RSS is how the news flows, whether
you see it or not. If not RSS, something exactly like RSS. ![]()
8. The Internet is layered. New technology comes on
line building on tech that already existed. RSS was like that. It built
on XML and HTTP, which built on text and TCP/IP. The new things that
Diaz likes so much, in exactly the same way, build on RSS. ![]()
9. When news authors don't understand how technology evolves, they propagate
incorrect notions to everyone else, including would-be inventors, who
have to figure it out for themselves, and then convince investors and
partners they know what they're doing -- when they just read in ZDNet
that things don't evolve at all. So Mr. Diaz does us all a disservice. ![]()
10. I object when technology writers tell the
story of technology incorrectly. People say I should just be happy to
see my name in the story, or in this case something that I fathered. No
deal. I want the accurate story out there. I want people to
understand how technology really works, because that's central to users
being empowered by it, instead of being controlled by it. ![]()
Bonus: Marshall Kirkpatrick, my partner in the Bad Hair Day podcast (tomorrow 7PM Pacific) has his own excellent rebuttal to the Diaz piece. ![]()
Recent Comments