My Photo

July 2008

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

Entries categorized "Marketing - Viral"

July 23, 2008

Hard RSS Results

from marketingstudies.net

As promised, we'll be taking a look at some hard numbers from the RSS marketing world, to see just how strong RSS really is as a marketing channel. If nothing else, these alone should show you that it's worth investing some time in to understanding RSS marketing.

Here are some of the latest numbers ...

a] CLICK-THROUGH RATES
According to the latest statistics from Pheedo, one of the most well-known RSS advertising networks, RSS feed click-through rations range from 7 to 11%. And according to DoubleClick, the average e-mail CTR is only 8.3%, showing that RSS is already outperforming e-mail.

How about the numbers from specific publishers? Lockergnome.com is one of the most popular tech sites on the internet, and also a great example of what can be achieved with RSS.

First of all, they are seeing a ration of 5:1 in favor of the number of RSS subscribers against e-mail subscribers, and even more interesting, a 500% better clickthrough ratio with RSS than with e-mail.

b] SEARCH ENGINE VISIBILITY

The BTI Group is a smaller VoIP provider and, through their high ranking blogsite [http://blog.btigroup.com/], the proof that RSS works for search engine positioning.

Here are just some of their achievements, as a result of their RSS marketing activities …

June 09, 2008

Advertising Age recommends NOT ADVERTISING

brandautopsy.com

Yep, you read that header right — Advertising Age recommends NOT ADVERTISING. A recent editorial in Ad Age shared HMOs (hot marketing opinions) about JetBlue’s current advertising campaign. The gist is this …

“JetBlue is missing the point with its recent ad push. What it needs is to get back to what made it a media and consumer darling: customer service and good internal and external communication.”

“… convincing more people to fly doesn't seem like a smart move for an airline that has trouble handling the passengers it already has. It won't fool new passengers, and it will only upset current passengers. JetBlue achieved its success by being unlike the other airlines. Its good name spread -- via word-of-mouth and smart marketing -- because great customer service gave it a compelling story to tell.”

“Priority No. 1 should be getting back to a place where consumers want to share good stories. Take the money being wasted on that campaign and plow it into customer service.”

Let’s take this a step further. BEFORE any company spends gobs of money on an advertising campaign, it should first spend money on improving the performance of a product/service and on ratcheting up the customer experience. ‘Nuff said! Errrahh!

May 15, 2008

rinse and repeat - sustainabile WOM

True_loveJohn Burg Futrure Visions

Most loving relationships kick off with a WOW phase.

20 years of marriage later, the WOW is now deeper, more real, more permanent.  But it isn't the viral "tell all my friends about him/her" WOW of infatuation, it is the deeply embedded wow of a meaningful relationship. 

Newlyweds talk about their spouses in glowing terms to anyone who will listen.  Most people who have been married for a lifetime don't shout their love from the rooftops, yet it exists deeply in their hearts.  What does this tell us about relationships, and how does this impact marketing?

Think about your marketing efforts.  Where is your loyalty play?  How do you encourage WOM among a loyal and familiar audience?  Is it possible to have your cake (loyalty) and eat it to (gain WOM from this group in an ongoing manner)?

Can brands deliver sustainable WOW?  Can a relationship become one of enamor, respect or awe in a sustainable fashion?  Can a brand constantly over-deliver, constantly WOW the customer, without the WOW become a yawn?  Sure, you can refresh your creative, but can a relationship built on WOW alone be sustainable?

Or is a sustainable relationship about initial WOW and consistent follow through on every occasional WOW moment - that special night out, that amazing vacation, that special gift just because?

Kudos to Brandon Schauer for bringing up the subject in the beautiful presentation embedded below (after the jump). For a quick summary, check out Whitney's bullet list.

http://jburg.typepad.com/future/2008/05/rinse-and-repea.html

December 22, 2007

Internet TV: 2007 Year in Review

Read/writeweb.com

Joost et alFrom YouTube’s continued dominance, the television networks’ newfound willingness to experiment online, the rise of the desktop Internet TV application, and a number of new PC-to-TV devices and set-top boxes — it’s been a big year for Internet TV in all shapes and forms. In this post we look back at 2007 through the lens of last100’s coverage, highlighting some of the important stories and trends, and how they point to what we might expect for Internet TV in 2008.

YouTube dominates

YouTube logoWhile the market for Internet TV is growing steadily — survey after survey shows that people are consuming more video online than ever before — as 2007 draws to an end, Google-owned YouTube is still the number one video destination site.

This isn’t just true in terms of traffic but also in terms of “mind share”; when people talk about online video they often refer only to YouTube. As a result, a number of hardware companies have added YouTube support to their devices in 2007, such as YouTube-compatible cameras and mobile phones capable of viewing and publishing video to YouTube.

And then there’s the strong relationship between Google and Apple, which this year has led to YouTube support being added to both the AppleTV and iPhone, with a change in the video format to boot. Apple successfully persuaded YouTube to start re-encoding its video catalog to the much higher quality (and Apple-preferred) H.264 codec.

Not one to rest on its laurels, YouTube introduced a number of new features of their own, including a redesiged player, the introduction of interactive overlay ads, better copyright filtering, and — like many Google properties — improvements to its mobile offering.

December 17, 2007

The Key To Google's Success: Innovation or Paranoia?

seekingalpha.com
by Ashkan Karbasfrooshan

Intel’s (INTC) Andy Grove had a popular saying: Only the Paranoid Survive. It was the name of his book. Another big thinker, Clay Christensen, penned a popular management book called The Innovator’s Dilemma. Keep those two titles in mind as you read the following.

Microsoft (MSFT)has been known for taking on too many competitors: Apple (AAPL), Sony (SNE), Nintendo (NTDOY.PK), Google (GOOG), Yahoo! (YHOO), Oracle (ORCL), Sun (JAVA), etc. The list goes on and on. Some are competitors of their core Office and Windows business, others in their emerging businesses such as XBOX, MSN Live, Zune etc.

But in a sign of how quickly things change, Google is leveraging its online dominance and now taking on:

  • Microsoft with Google Apps,
  • Yahoo! for portaldom and email supremacy,
  • Telcos by bidding on the 700 Mhz spectrum,
  • Wikipedia via Knol,
  • eBay (EBAY)/Craigslist via Base,
  • eBay/Paypal via Checkout,
  • etc. etc.

The NY Times has a great 5-pager on the MSFT/Google fight and MSFT’s own Don Dodge does a great job of summarizing the piece. Because everything is a click away and the Web is indeed a brave new interconnected world, suddenly, you compete with everyone and everyone competes with you.

Incidentally, Google still has not had any notable successes apart from Google, AdSense and AdWords, the latter two which are two sides of the same coin.

Google is now a grow-by-acquisition company, much like MSFT has been for the past decade, too. This is not to say that they don’t innovate or invent internally at all- Gmail is one such example. But it does illustrate Google’s tricky position where they are competing with everyone and while being everyone's friend.

For example, when I was planning MetaMojo.com 1.0 with Yahoo!’s API, I recall emailing Toni Schneider (who had just sold Oddpost to Yahoo! and ran their API commercial licenses) off my Gmail account. I knew Google was not sitting there and reading my emails, but the thought did cross my mind that Google’s ambitions online would be limited because of its dominance online.

By then, Google Apps was just a rumor, but once they began to assemble the pieces brick-by-brick, you knew they were betting on the rapid rollout of cloud computing in an effort to take out MSFT.

The problem is quite simple: Companies who don’t compete with Google (generally offline players) will never embrace or adopt Google Apps because the Web is just not there yet; companies who would embrace or adopt Google Apps might not feel very comfortable with Google hosting anything remotely important.

We use Google Apps at our company, but it’s not reliable enough for large documents, so we continue to use MSFT Office. If we were to compete with Google, we would think twice even if it were robust enough. Google, of course, is a partner of ours via WatchMojo.com (we have a partnership with its YouTube unit), but the point is: much like why Facebook chose MSFT to partner with and not Yahoo! or Google, so long as Google seeks to compete with and take out every online company out there, I’m just not sure if Google’s non-search business will take off.

Why? Because Only the Paranoid Survive. But Google itself needs to watch its own back; just this week Haika raised $5M in funding, last week another search player raised a Series C $10M round. The Quintura guys seem to be gunning for Google, too (I love those ads, though it might come back to haunt them). PowerSet, still largely a PR machine with little substance to show, also has plans to take on Google. Individually these all seem small, but Google should be concerned with protecting its neck before looking to take someone else’s head off.

I personally think Google’s main threat in search is not from another search player, but rather a wireless search outfit that will be able to organize the information out there from handheld devices, that would be pretty killer… but of course, it’s something Google’s already working on. Because indeed, Only the Paranoid survive. But Google itself will be wary of leading in wireless because make no doubt about it, it will come at the expense of its online revenue bread and butter.

A Quicker Resort This Year to Deep Discounting

Click here for more of the NYTimes article

 
Published: December 17, 2007
 

KMART made a generation of bargain hunters react like starving dogs to a ringing bell. Now Internet companies want to bring the blue-light special to the cellphone — only this time, the bells are text messages telling shoppers that Valentino clutches, Christian Dior sunglasses and other luxury items are selling at more than 50 percent off.

Skip to next paragraph
Annie Tritt for The New York Times

Upmarket handbags will be the sort of items offered on Ideeli’s Web site.

Annie Tritt for The New York Times

Ideeli’s chief executive, Paul Hurley, sees a game aspect in scarcity.

That is the concept behind Ideeli, a Web site that will officially be introduced Monday, offering members a chance to buy heavily discounted luxury items — as long as they are quick enough. Some items sell out within hours.

Ideeli is partly shopping as sport, but it also speaks to the nervousness of retailers this holiday season. Because of economic fears linked especially to the subprime mortgage trouble, retailers and brand producers scaled back their inventories with early holiday promotions last month amid concern that consumers planned to spend less.

December 08, 2007

The Evolving Web

from the ecommercetimes.com

Click here for the entire interview on Meebo

TechNewsWorld: How do you think widgets are changing the Web?

Martin Green: I think they're changing it in a huge way. I think the major thing is that the Web is undergoing a little bit of a transformation -- like the PC industry did, maybe 20 years ago -- where it's going from vertically integrated to specialist. In the PC industry, it went from the vertical integration of chips and software and assembly [to] specialists.

The Web is doing the same thing. There are specialists in ad sales, and you see even the big guys like Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT) Latest News about Microsoft, Platform A at AOL, and Google (Nasdaq: GOOG) Latest News about Google excel at that. Then you see specialists in aggregation of audiences and content, and you see people like social networks -- as well as portals -- do that.

Widgets is an interesting specialty in and of itself. It provides content out into the Web, and you see people like RockYou -- which emerged over the last two years to reach one in five people on the Internet Over 800,000 High Quality Domains Available For Your Business. Click Here.. They have done it by providing content into the social networks and portals ... and they're a specialist in doing that.

TechNewsWorld: What do you think is the next phase for widgets?

Green: We have a horse in this answer, in this game. One of them is for them to be rich applications -- not just display -- but to have true interactivity. That could be like Facebook Latest News about Facebook applications, where widgets morph more into applications than, say, just a slideshow with glitter text. Then, I think the next phase after that is that they go live.

TechNewsWorld: Are you describing something similar to Google Gadgets?

Green: Google Gadgets is a step in that direction, but I think the next phase after that is that they become true applications where people can interact with the widget, make it into something else, and be doing it at the same time. The Web has traditionally been organized into billions of pages where there are a couple of people at any given point in time on a different URL (Uniform Resource Locator). These rich Internet applications using Ajax and Flash that are distributed throughout the Web can aggregate audiences so that they are there together.

For example, we work with record labels, and one of them, Universal, launched Kanye West's album in the second week of September. They had a listening party online and at their label, where people could stream the entire album, check it out, talk with other people who were listening to it at the same time. They did that for a week. All of the broadcast networks are doing the same type of listening- or viewing-party thing, where people are coming together for a shared experience.

December 02, 2007

If the Shoe Fits, Wear It. If Not, Design One That Does.

Kirk Condyles for The New York Times

Robert Klemm, who has 60 pairs of shoes in his own collection, went to the Steve Madden Web site to design the gingham pumps that his girlfriend, Kate Feehan, is wearing.

 
Published: December 2, 2007
 

EVEN for the most dedicated shopper, finding just the right pair of shoes can be elusive. A store-to-store search — whether on the Web or at the mall — can take hours. Shoppers may think they’ve found the perfect pair, only to be stymied by a problem with fit, style or color.

Skip to next paragraph

If you don’t like the shoes you find in the stores, you can go to a Web site like Stevemadden.com and choose your own color, pattern, style and size.

It’s not that retailers don’t try, as the huge shoe sections in department stores like Saks and Nordstrom, and Web sites like Zappos and Shoes.com, attest. But for those with very individual or exacting tastes — and with money to spare — some Internet retailers offer design-it-yourself options in footwear. Customization is more common with athletic shoes, but fashion footwear is beginning to catch up.

Makers like Vans and Nike are among the companies that offer customized shoes, allowing both women and men to create their own look from existing styles, colors and materials

November 23, 2007

The Secret Strategies Behind Many “Viral” Videos

techcrunch.com

This guest post was written by Dan Ackerman Greenberg, co-founder of viral video marketing company The Comotion Group and lead TA for the Stanford Facebook Class. Dan will graduate from the Stanford Management Science & Engineering Masters program in June.

Have you ever watched a video with 100,000 views on YouTube and thought to yourself: “How the hell did that video get so many views?” Chances are pretty good that this didn’t happen naturally, but rather that some company worked hard to make it happen – some company like mine.

When most people talk about “viral videos,” they’re usually referring to videos like Miss Teen South Carolina, Smirnoff’s Tea Partay music video, the Sony Bravia ads, Soulja Boy - videos that have traveled all around the internet and been posted on YouTube, MySpace, Google Video, Facebook, Digg, blogs, etc. - videos with millions and millions of views.

Over the past year, I have run clandestine marketing campaigns meant to ensure that promotional videos become truly viral, as these examples have become in the extreme. In this post, I will share some of the techniques I use to do my job: to get at least 100,000 people to watch my clients’ “viral” videos.

Secret #1: Not all viral videos are what they seem

There are tens of thousands of videos uploaded to YouTube each day (I’ve heard estimates between 10-65,000 videos per day). I don’t care how “viral” you think your video is; no one is going to find it and no one is going to watch it.

The members of my startup are hired guns – our clients give us videos and we make them go viral. Our rule of thumb is that if we don’t get a video 100,000 views, we don’t charge.

So far, we’ve worked on 80-90 videos and we’ve seen overwhelming success. In the past 3 months, we’ve achieved over 20 million views for our clients, with videos ranging from 100,000 views to upwards of 1.5 million views each. In other words, not all videos go viral organically – there is a method to the madness.

I can’t reveal our clients’ names and I can’t link to the videos we’ve worked on, because YouTube surely doesn’t like what we’re doing and our clients hate to admit that they need professional help with their “viral” videos. But I can give you a general idea of who we’ve worked with: two top Hollywood movie studios, a major record label, a variety of very well known consumer brands, and a number of different startups, both domestic and international.

This summer, we were approached by a Hollywood movie studio and asked to help market a series of viral clips they had created in advance of a blockbuster. The videos were 10-20 seconds each, were shot from what appeared to be a camera phone, and captured a series of unexpected and shocking events that required professional post-production and CGI. Needless to say, the studio had invested a significant amount of money in creating the videos but every time they put them online, they couldn’t get more than a few thousand views.

We took six videos and achieved:

  • 6 million views on YouTube
  • ~30,000 ratings
  • ~10,000 favorites
  • ~10,000 comments
  • 200+ blog posts linking back to the videos
  • All six videos made it into the top 5 Most Viewed of the Day, and the two that went truly viral (1.5 million views each) were #1 and #2 Most Viewed of the Week.

The following principles were the secrets to our success.

2. Content is NOT King

If you want a truly viral video that will get millions of people to watch and share it, then yes, content is key. But good content is not necessary to get 100,000 views if you follow these strategies.

Don’t get me wrong: the content is what will drive visitors back to a site. So a video must have a decent concept, but one shouldn’t agonize over determining the best “viral” video possible. Generally, a concept should not be forced because it fits a brand. Rather, a brand should be fit into a great concept. Here are some guidelines we follow:

  • Make it short: 15-30 seconds is ideal; break down long stories into bite-sized clips
  • Design for remixing: create a video that is simple enough to be remixed over and over again by others. Ex: “Dramatic Hamster”
  • Don’t make an outright ad: if a video feels like an ad, viewers won’t share it unless it’s really amazing. Ex: Sony Bravia
  • Make it shocking: give a viewer no choice but to investigate further. Ex: “UFO Haiti”
  • Use fake headlines: make the viewer say, “Holy shit, did that actually happen?!” Ex: “Stolen Nascar”
  • Appeal to sex: if all else fails, hire the most attractive women available to be in the video. Ex: “Yoga 4 Dudes”

These recent videos would have been perfect had they been viral “ads” pointing people back to websites:

3. Core Strategy: Getting onto the “Most Viewed” page

Now that a video is ready to go, how the hell is it going to attract 100,000 viewers?

The core concept of video marketing on YouTube is to harness the power of the site’s traffic. Here’s the idea: something like 80 million videos are watched each day on YouTube, and a significant number of those views come from people clicking the “Videos” tab at the top. The goal is to get a video on that Videos page, which lists the Daily Most Viewed videos.

If we succeed, the video will no longer be a single needle in the haystack of 10,000 new videos per day. It will be one of the twenty videos on the Most Viewed page, which means that we can grab 1/20th of the clicks on that page! And the higher up on the page our video is, the more views we are going to get.

So how do we get the first 50,000 views we need to get our videos onto the Most Viewed list?

  • Blogs: We reach out to individuals who run relevant blogs and actually pay them to post our embedded videos. Sounds a little bit like cheating/PayPerPost, but it’s effective and it’s not against any rules.
  • Forums: We start new threads and embed our videos. Sometimes, this means kickstarting the conversations by setting up multiple accounts on each forum and posting back and forth between a few different users. Yes, it’s tedious and time-consuming, but if we get enough people working on it, it can have a tremendous effect.
  • MySpace: Plenty of users allow you to embed YouTube videos right in the comments section of their MySpace pages. We take advantage of this.
  • Facebook: Share, share, share. We’ve taken Dave McClure’s advice and built a sizeable presence on Facebook, so sharing a video with our entire friends list can have a real impact. Other ideas include creating an event that announces the video launch and inviting friends, writing a note and tagging friends, or posting the video on Facebook Video with a link back to the original YouTube video.
  • Email lists: Send the video to an email list. Depending on the size of the list (and the recipients’ willingness to receive links to YouTube videos), this can be a very effective strategy.
  • Friends: Make sure everyone we know watches the video and try to get them to email it out to their friends, or at least share it on Facebook.

Each video has a shelf life of 48 hours before it’s moved from the Daily Most Viewed list to the Weekly Most Viewed list, so it’s important that this happens quickly. As I mentioned before, when done right, this is a tremendously successful strategy.

4. Title Optimization

Once a video is on the Most Viewed page, what can be done to maximize views?

It seems obvious, but people see hundreds of videos on YouTube, and the title and thumbnail are an easy way for video publishers to actively persuade someone to click on a video. Titles can be changed a limitless number of times, so we sometimes have a catchy (and somewhat misleading) title for the first few days, then later switch to something more relevant to the brand. Recently, I’ve noticed a trend towards titling videos with the phrases “exclusive,” “behind the scenes,” and “leaked video.”

5. Thumbnail Optimization

If a video is sitting on the Most Viewed page with nineteen other videos, a compelling video thumbnail is the single best strategy to maximize the number of clicks the video gets.

YouTube provides three choices for a video’s thumbnail, one of which is grabbed from the exact middle of the video. As we edit our videos, we make sure that the frame at the very middle is interesting. It’s no surprise that videos with thumbnails of half naked women get hundreds of thousands of views. Not to say that this is the best strategy, but you get the idea. Two rules of thumb: the thumbnail should be clear (suggesting high video quality) and ideally it should have a face or at least a person in it.

Also, when we feel particularly creative, we optimize all three thumbnails then change the thumbnail every few hours. This is definitely an underused strategy, but it’s an interesting way to keep a video fresh once it’s on the Most Viewed list.

See the highlighted videos in the screenshot below for a good example of how a compelling title and screenshot can make all the difference once the video is on the Most Viewed page.

6. Commenting: Having a conversation with yourself

Every power user on YouTube has a number of different accounts. So do we. A great way to maximize the number of people who watch our videos is to create some sort of controversy in the comments section below the video. We get a few people in our office to log in throughout the day and post heated comments back and forth (you can definitely have a lot of fun with this). Everyone loves a good, heated discussion in the comments section - especially if the comments are related to a brand/startup.

Also, we aren’t afraid to delete comments – if someone is saying our video (or your startup) sucks, we just delete their comment. We can’t let one user’s negativity taint everyone else’s opinions.

We usually get one comment for every thousand views, since most people watching YouTube videos aren’t logged in. But a heated comment thread (done well) will engage viewers and will drive traffic back to our sites.

7. Releasing all videos simultaneously

Once people are watching a video, how do we keep them engaged and bring them back to a website?

A lot of the time our clients say: “We’ve got 5 videos and we’re going to release one every few days so that viewers look forward to each video.”

This is the wrong way to think about YouTube marketing. If we have multiple videos, we post all of them at once. If someone sees our first video and is so intrigued that they want to watch more, why would we make them wait until we post the next one? We give them everything up front. If a user wants to watch all five of our videos right now, there’s a much better chance that we’ll be able to persuade them to click through to our website. We don’t make them wait after seeing the first video, because they’re never going to see the next four.

Once our first video is done, we delete our second video then re-upload it. Now we have another 48-hour window to push it to the Most Viewed page. Rinse and repeat. Using this strategy, we give our most interested viewers the chance to fully engage with a campaign without compromising the opportunity to individually release and market each consecutive video.

8. Strategic Tagging: Leading viewers down the rabbit hole

This is one of my favorite strategies and one that I think we invented. YouTube allows you to tag your videos with keywords that make your videos show up in relevant searches. For the first week that our video is online, we don’t use keyword tags to optimize the video for searches on YouTube. Instead, we’ve discovered that you can use tags to control the videos that show up in the Related Videos box.

I like to think about it as leading viewers down the rabbit hole. The idea here is to make it as easy as possible for viewers to engage with all your content, rather than jumping away to “related” content that actually has nothing to do with your brand/startup.

So how do we strategically tag? We choose three or four unique tags and use only these tags for all of the videos we post. I’m not talking about obscure tags; I’m talking about unique tags, tags that are not used by any other YouTube videos. Done correctly, this will allow us to have full control over the videos that show up as “Related Videos.”

When views start trailing off after a few days to a week, it’s time to add some more generic tags, tags that draw out the long tail of a video as it starts to appear in search results on YouTube and Google.

9. Metrics/Tracking: How we measure effectiveness

The following is how we measure the success of our viral videos.

For one, we tweak the links put up on YouTube (whether in a YouTube channel or in a video description) by adding “?video=1” to the end of each URL. This makes it much easier to track inbound links using Google Analytics or another metrics tool.

TubeMogul and VidMetrix also track views/comments/ratings on each individual video and draw out nice graphs that can be shared with the team. Additionally, these tools follow the viral spread of a video outside of YouTube and throughout other social media sites and blogs.

Conclusion

The Wild West days of Lonely Girl and Ask A Ninja are over. You simply can’t expect to post great videos on YouTube and have them go viral on their own, even if you think you have the best videos ever. These days, achieving true virality takes serious creativity, some luck, and a lot of hard work. So, my advice: fire your PR firm and do it yourself.

Fanista - Bringing Amway into the 21st Century

 
from mashable.com

 

Fanista

It would seem Amway, that company the brought the term “pyramid schemes” to a whole new light in the 1980’s, has decided to have a go at the 21st century by backing a new site named “Fanista“.

With a focus on CDs and DVDs for now, Fanista will later be adding books and digital downloads. And, yes, there is a pyramid scheme involved. Now named “Common Interest Commerce” (or CIC), the idea is that you bring in your friends and you earn 5% of what they buy, and then you get 5% of whatever their referrals buy. You will earn “insider perks” and “achieve social status” for being a “tastemaker”. Gee… this sounds so much like one of those Amway pitches I got trapped in to listening to every few months in the late 1980’s.

While it sounds loosely like an affiliate program that we’re all familiar with nowadays, it’s the active recruitment that hearkens back to the old Amway business model. Considering the bad taste that the name Amway leaves in most people’s mouthes probably won’t help this site gain much momentum, if any.